|
3/02/2009 10:08:41 AM
|
Mal
Posts 6
|
I was wondering if its possible for someone to change the ride statistics for a couple of rides that I do. The Montacute Rd Stats (http://www.cycle2max.com/bike-hill-climb/Montacute-Road.aspx?id=515) don't seem to be right compared to when I map it on Mapmyride.com (http://www.mapmyride.com/ride/australia/-newton/751711972898) .Click on the elevation box in the right hand corner to get the stats up.
Starting Alt: 159
Finishing Alt: 511
Elev Gain: 352
Average Grade: 4.8%.
Also a couple of other rides I do don't have any values at all.
McIntyre Rd (http://www.cycle2max.com/bike-hill-climb/McIntyre-road.aspx?id=650) Mapmyride (http://www.mapmyride.com/route/au/gulfview%20heights/229990613943)
Grove Way (http://www.cycle2max.com/bike-hill-climb/The-Grove-Way.aspx?id=225) Mapmyride (http://www.mapmyride.com/route/au/salisbury%20heights/937998989263)
Cheers
|
|
3/02/2009 8:35:13 PM
|
Cos
Posts 30
|
I agree, this fix is a long time coming.
I asked for a correction to the montacute climb a couple of times in the past, with only one response from Andy, who promised to fix it but never did.
Come on C2M team...whats the issue??
|
|
5/02/2009 11:18:26 AM
|
Admin
Posts 22
|
Hi Guys,
This has been updated for you. If you notice any other problems please let us know and we will fix up asap.
The team at c2m.
|
|
5/02/2009 3:45:50 PM
|
Mal
Posts 6
|
Thanks C2M team, keep up the good work....
|
|
4/06/2009 2:09:49 PM
|
Michael Kakanis
Posts 6
|
another one is Mt Gravatt lookout http://www.cycle2max.com/bike-hill-climb/Mt-Gravatt-Lookout.aspx?id=62 which is another 300m, it says 1.7km but it is over 2km. i know it doesn't sound like much but when the climb is 2km 300m makes a difference to power outputs etc.
|
|
4/06/2009 2:12:12 PM
|
Michael Kakanis
Posts 6
|
also Springbrooke http://www.cycle2max.com/bike-hill-climb/springbrook.aspx?id=875, and Beechmont-lower http://www.cycle2max.com/bike-hill-climb/Beechmont-Lower.aspx?id=859 are both missing average gradient even though they have elevation gains and total distance.
|
|
4/06/2009 10:39:12 PM
|
Jeffrey Schulz
Posts 56
|
Does the C2M team check emails as I sent one a while back and have not got a reply.
|
|
5/06/2009 10:38:18 AM
|
Admin
Posts 22
|
Hi Guys,
We will fix up the courses for you today. Yes we did receive the email but haven't had a chance to action it but will today.
Thanks Guys.
The team at c2m.
|
|
2/08/2009 7:01:12 PM
|
Greg Tompos
Posts 3
|
Re: the Montacute climb. Someone erroneously put one on the page for the ACT instead of SA. They've listed it as "Montacute/Marble Hill SA". Any chance of getting that one removed?
Also, is there any way you can make climbs that other people have contributed editable by others so elevation profiles can be added if they're not already there? Many of the ACT climbs don't have elevation profiles and I would be willing to add them as I ride them.
|
|
23/11/2009 7:56:37 PM
|
Steve Roe
Posts 1
|
If Baw Baw ride statistics are correct at the top right of the page - 680 metres elevation gain over 6000m distance giving 11.3% gradient, then the main text under directions refering to how steep it is compared to others is wrong. It states that the change in elevation is 780 metres over 6000 metres distance giving 13% gradient. Only one of these can be correct.
|
|
23/11/2009 10:43:03 PM
|
Trevor Spencer
Posts 6
|
baw baw is 11.3 % for 6.65 km and climbs 750m
|
|
8/12/2009 8:26:30 AM
|
Elizabeth Hall
Posts 1
|
I rode it on Sunday. I used the downhill to map it, as I tend to zig-zag the steepest pinches on the way up! I got 6.4km and 728m descent, therefore 11.38% on a Polar CS400 (not GPS).
|
|
8/12/2009 8:55:32 AM
|
Gavin Wright
Posts 2
|
I think someone accidentally used the starting altitude (780m) as the actual altitude gain. That is where the error lies, and it has been transposed onto hillclimbr.com as well. On cycle2max the power calculation is therefore more accurate.
|
|
7/03/2010 8:57:49 PM
|
John Van Seters
Posts 54
|
As explained in other forum 'editing hillclimbs' i have none of the hill climbs that ive entered listed in my courses
In particular Trestles Bridge hill climb has no starting point, which is in fact Trestles Bridge, and no end point, which is in fact 60km sign on Grantula Rd before top of rise.
Appreciate your correction.
Thanks
JVS
|
|
pages:
1 |
|---|